COVID-19

Proposed BLM Interim Guidance to Provide Relief for Oil & Gas Operators

Lease Suspension and Reduction of Royalty Rates Available

Late on April 21, 2020, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) issued two separate Interim Guidance statements to help alleviate some of the industry’s and BLM’s hardships created by the COVID-19 pandemic and the dramatic collapse of oil prices.

Interim Guidance for Lease Suspension Requests During the COVID-19 National Emergency

Federal oil and gas leases may qualify for a suspension of production or a suspension of operations due to force majeure provision of Section 17 of the Mineral Lease Act of 1920. Both types of suspensions toll the lease term, but the lessee must continue to pay any rental or minimum royalty payments that are due during the suspension.

  • Suspension of Operations (SO) suspends the operational obligations of the lessee on a lease where operations have begun. No operations can be conducted on the lease during the suspension. However, we note that casual uses that do not require a permit or routine maintenance are allowed.
  • Suspension of Production (SP) suspends the production obligation of the lessee on a lease where production has already been established. A lessee may continue to conduct operations on the lease.

To apply for the SO or SP under this Interim Guidance, the application must be executed by all operating rights owners and include the following:

  • Statement of the circumstances that render such relief necessary relative to the COVID-19 national emergency, despite the lessee’s due care and diligence (i.e., shelter-in-place mandates, quarantines, curtailment of travel, promoting social distance has caused lack of contractor and employees available to access and operate well sites, safety concerns, etc.);
  • Lease numbers;
  • Lease expiration and/or held by production dates;
  • Current lessee(s) and operating rights owners; and
  • Supporting evidence of the COVID-19 impact.

The application must be submitted to the appropriate BLM State Office.

If requesting the SO or SP for the suspension of operation or production obligations for an approved federal unit, the application may be executed by the unit operator on behalf of operating rights owners of the unitized tracts. Note, a unit SO or SP only suspends the obligations under the unit agreement not the obligations of individual federal leases. A separate application must be separately requested for a suspension of the specific committed lease.

BLM will have five business days to review the application. Once approved, it will be effective on the first day of the month the completed application is filed, or the date specified by BLM.

The SO or SP will expire one year from the date BLM approves the suspension or earlier if the operator resumes operations or production prior to the one-year date.

The Interim Guidance specifically does not apply to Indian leases.

Interim Guidance for Royalty Rate Reduction Requests for Oil and Gas Leases during the COVID-19 national emergency

Due to the COVID-19 national emergency and collapse of oil price, federal oil and gas leases may qualify for a royalty reduction under 43 CFR Subpart 3103.4-1.

To apply for a temporary royalty rate reduction under this Interim Guidance, the application must be executed by the operator/payor and include the following:

  • A self-certification statement with supporting documentation from the operator that the lease would be capable of production in paying quantities were it not for the extreme circumstances presented due to COVID-19 pandemic.
  • A simple economic analysis table that shows the lease(s) that is/are uneconomic at the current royalty rate, but would be economic with a royalty rate reduction, including:
    • Relevant market oil price (i.e., West Texas Intermediate spot price or basin level price);
    • Royalty rate;
    • Production capability; and
    • Operating costs (summarized for the lease)
  • The requested temporary royalty rate (i.e. reduction from 12½ to 0.5%)

All trade secrets or other proprietary data – operating costs and related data – should be marked as “confidential/proprietary.”

This Interim Guidance and application process described above also applies a reduction for Class II reinstated leases as provided for in 43 CFR 3103 and 3108.2-3(f).

BLM will have five business days to review the application. Once approved, the royalty reduction will be effective on the first day of the month the completed application is filed, or the date specified by BLM.

The royalty rate reduction will terminate one year from the date BLM approves the application; thereafter, the lease will revert to its original rate.

The Interim Guidance specifically does not apply to Indian leases.

We encourage you to visit Holland & Hart’s Coronavirus Resource Site, a consolidated informational resource offering practical guidelines and proactive solutions to help companies protect their business interests and their workforce. The dynamic Resource Site is regularly refreshed with new topics and updates as the COVID-19 outbreak and the legal and regulatory responses continue to evolve. Sign up to receive updates and for upcoming webinars.

EPA Issues Temporary Policy for Violations Caused By COVID-19

On March 26, 2020 EPA issued a temporary policy for enforcement of environmental legal obligations during the COVID-19 pandemic. The policy provides the framework for the agency’s use of its enforcement discretion where COVID-19 related worker shortages and governmental restrictions affect facility operations and impede the ability of regulated entities to comply with EPA requirements. The policy does not extend to Superfund or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) corrective actions, which will be subject to forthcoming guidance, or pesticide imports under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”).

Broadly speaking, the policy states that EPA will forego enforcement of certain civil violations where compliance is not reasonably practicable due to the COVID-19 pandemic, subject to compliance with specified reporting and documentation requirements. The application of enforcement discretion does not apply to criminal violations of environmental statutes and EPA indicates it will distinguish between unavoidable violations that result from COVID-19 restrictions and violations resulting from intentional disregard of legal requirements.

EPA’s policy applies different standards based on the category of potential noncompliance. If compliance with routine monitoring and reporting—such as stack testing, water and effluent sampling, inspections or training—is not reasonably practicable due to COVID-19, entities should report noncompliance using existing procedures as set forth in permit or statute. If such procedures do not exist, facilities must develop documentation and maintain noncompliance information internally. Ultimately, the better a facility’s documentation of how COVID-19 exigencies made compliance reasonably impracticable, the more likely EPA will be to forego enforcement.

The policy likewise provides guidelines for the following situations:

  • settlement agreement and consent decree reporting obligations and milestones;
  • facility operations impacted by COVID-19 that create an acute risk or imminent threat to human health or the environment;
  • facilities suffering from failure of air emission control, wastewater or waste treatment systems, or other equipment that may result in exceedances;
  • hazardous waste generators;
  • animal feeding operations;
  • public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act; and
  • critical infrastructure.

Regardless of the situation, entities must first make every effort to comply with environmental compliance obligations. If compliance is not reasonably practicable because of circumstances caused by COVID-19, entities must do the following to be covered by the policy:

  1. Minimize effects and duration of any noncompliance caused by COVID-19;
  2. Identify the specific nature and dates of noncompliance;
  3. Identify how COVID-19 was the cause of noncompliance and decisions and actions taken in response;
  4. Return to compliance ASAP;
  5. Document the information and actions in 1–4.

Compliance with steps 1–5 is a condition of coverage under the policy.

Effective Period Starting March 13. The policy is retroactive—it applies to noncompliance events occurring from March 13 until the policy is terminated. During the effective period, the policy applies in lieu of otherwise applicable EPA policies. Even after the policy is revoked, noncompliance events that occurred during the effective period will be covered by the policy.

Caution! State Enforcement. The policy applies only to EPA enforcement actions—authorized states and tribes may take a different approach. It is likely that state agencies will issue their own parallel guidance in the coming days and weeks, and permittees should look to those policies in states that have delegated authority to administer environmental programs.

What Is Excluded? The policy does not apply to:

  • activities carried out under Superfund and RCRA Corrective Action enforcement instruments, although EPA indicated that separate guidance will be issued to address these programs;
  • pesticides and related imports;
  • requirements for preventing, responding to, and reporting accidental releases of oil and hazardous substances;
  • on-going enforcement matters.

This article was authored by Emily SchillingAshley PeckChris LeCates, and Hayley Siltanen.

We encourage you to visit Holland & Hart’s Coronavirus Resource Site, a consolidated informational resource offering practical guidelines and proactive solutions to help companies protect their business interests and their workforce. The dynamic Resource Site is regularly refreshed with new topics and updates as the COVID-19 outbreak and the legal and regulatory responses continue to evolve. Sign up to receive updates and for upcoming webinars.